Based on the law and the court decision, why did the Supreme Court rule that Westboro Baptist Church’s speech was protected

Video link: (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/madoff/?)

read these instructions at least three times through before posting. Also read my weekly announcements for specific assignment hints, guidance, and possible extra credit.
You MUST complete Writing Assignment/Group Discussion (WA) #3
Remember you will fail this assignment and face a possible referral to the Office of Academic Integrity if you QUOTE, CUT/PASTE FROM ANY RESOURCE, INCLUDING THE ASSIGNED MATERIAL, or use/rely on any resources, including classmates, the lecture slides, or Internet sources, other than the three resources (textbook, video) In addressing the prompt below (in red and italicized), you must cite to Assigned Material in your Post and Replies (see below). You may use the lectures and lectures slides for your own learning and background, but you may not cite to the lectures or lecture slides in your Post or Replies (you will be able to find a similar reference in the textbook).
If you chose to complete this writing assignment, watch the video After watching/reading the Assigned Material prepare your writing assignment (post) in a Word document. You may use the spell-check and grammar check features. Access your discussion board by clicking on the link above and create a new thread. Once you create a new thread cut and paste your writing assignment from your Word document into your thread by 11:59 PM on Saturday. After copying your Writing Assignment to the thread, you MUST then upload your Writing Assignment (post) to SafeAssign within 5 minutes to avoid a 0 score. The SafeAssign link can be found below the Writing Assignment/Group Discussion in Blackboard. Unfortunately, Blackboard does not allow for SafeAssign submission in the discussion board. If you do not upload your Writing Assignment (post) to SafeAssign, you will earn a 0 score on that assignment.
Click above "Writing Assignment/Group Discussion # to access the discussion board. Your initial post is worth 70 points and your replies (two are required) are worth 30 points, 100 points total for the writing assignment. Please read the additional instructions in the syllabus. You will not be able to see other posts until you post. Please treat this assignment as a serious writing assignment. The rubric is strictly followed and no one gets credit just for posting, therefore prepare your post ahead of time and copy into your thread. Once you post, you will be able to see other posts and you can then reply. However, if you post in error before your post is complete or your post is blank, the first post will be graded even if blank.
You are required to reply to at least two of your classmates by 11:59 PM on Sunday. Your replies must be substantive and MUST include citations in parenthesis according to the instructions above. For example, your replies should extend the discussion or provide another legal perspective, but your replies should not be critical of your classmate’s work. Your replies are worth 30 points and you must provide more than one substantive reply to be eligible for 30 points.
IMPORTANT GUIDELINES:

1. Read Chapter 3 (You must have at least one citation to Chapter 3 in your Post.)
2. Watch Frontline: The Madoff Affair.Click on the link above to watch the video in preparation for the writing assignment and take notes. (You must cite in your Post.)
3. Visit the Business Roundtable website and read the August 2019 article "Business Roundtable Redefines the Purpose of a Corporation to Promote 'An Economy that Serves All Americans'". (You must cite in your Post.)
4. Based on the law and the court decision, why did the Supreme Court rule that Westboro Baptist Church’s speech was protected? Explain using thorough legal analysis with at least five citations as explained above.

5. Grading Criteria:
   Criteria Failure Unacceptable Acceptable Good Excellent
   Quality of Post No post, post is submitted after due date, post does not address prompt, and/or violations of rules, including using unauthorized resources or providing no or inaccurate citations Does not refer to the Assigned Material in a substantive way or does not fully address the prompt within word limit and on time with few citations as indicated in instructions or inaccurate citations

   Shows some knowledge of the Assigned Material within word limit and on time with citations as indicated in instructions    Shows knowledge of the Assigned Material and offers an original and critical post within the word limit and on time with citations as indicated in instructions    Shows substantive knowledge of the Assigned material and offers an original and critical post within the word limit and on time with citations as indicated in instructions
   

70 points 0 45 53 60 70
Quality of Reply/
Replies (two required)

No replies, reply/replies are submitted after due date, no citations in replies, and/or rule violations

Only one reply or replies show no knowledge of material or inaccurate citations

Two replies on time showing some knowledge of the material with citations
Two replies on time showing knowledge of the material with citations
Two or more replies on time showing substantive knowledge with citations

30 points 0 0 22 25 30

6. The posts/replies must be your original work. Do not collaborate with others. Do not quote or cut and paste from any source, including the textbook. Show your own understanding. Use of the Internet or other sources outside the Assigned Material is strictly prohibited and a violation of the Honor Code. Violation of these rules will result in a grade of 0 and a possible Honor Code violation. Failure to Post your writing assignment (post only not replies) to SafeAssign will result in a score of 0.

Possible response to this essay:
Snyder v. Phelps (2011)

The First Amendment protects people's right to speech, which allows them to freely express their issues by picketing, among other means. Based on the analysis of the case involving Snyder and Phelps (2011), the Supreme Court ruled that Westboro Baptist Church’s speech was protected since their protests were of broad issues that are of interest to the society rather than matters of “personal or private concern” which is protected under The First Amendment (Business Roundtable, 2019). This Amendment gives the church and other concerned parties the right to hold peaceful demonstrations, such as anti-gay protests outside funeral homes and military bases, among other public places. 

Facts from the case indicate that the church held its protests in a public place. That action meant that congregants did not violate personal privacy, and their protests were of public interests and not private concerns, which is not a violation of the law under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment (Business Roundtable, 2019). Arguably, the Supreme Court primarily ruled that Westboro Baptist Church’s speech was protected because the church's leadership led protests against public interests rather than personal issues, which is a broad issue of interest to the community at large that is protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution.

The founders of the Constitution understood the significance of freedom of speech, which is why they drafted and passed the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, which gives people the right to picket and express public concerns freely (Karla, 2017). During the ruling of the case between Snyder and Phelps, the Supreme Court held that the church's actions were motivated by matters of public concern rather than matters of private significance, which is not a violation of the law. The Supreme Court argued that speech deals with issues affecting or concerned with public interest, such as moral, political, or social concerns. Therefore, when a speech is of societal concern, then it is protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution. During the ruling, the court analyzed the context and content of the speech and noted that the church rightfully exercised its constitutional rights by protesting in front of Snyder's funeral home (Frontline. t.s, 12-15th minutes). The court further noted that the leadership of the church had ensured that their followers (protesters) held the demonstrations in public land which was near the funeral home, which is protected by the right of speech as expressed in the First Amendment, which explains why it ruled in favor of the church (Frontline. t.s, 34th minute).
In conclusion, the main reason why the Supreme Court ruled that Westboro Baptist Church’s speech was protected based on the law and the court's decision is that the right to free speech is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The court held that the right to freedom of speech protects the church's leader (Phelps) and his church members from expressing their opinions freely in public places.

References
Business Roundtable (BR). (Aug 19, 2019). Business Roundtable Redefines the Purpose of a Corporation to Promote ‘An Economy That Serves All Americans’. Retrieved February 23rd, 2024 from: https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans
Frontline. (2014), The Madoff Affair. Retrieved February 23rd, 2024 from:
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/madoff
Karla K. Gower. (2017). Legal and Ethical Considerations for Public Relations: Third Edition. Waveland Press.