Instructions: In this discussion, you will need to post your response (no fewer than 200 words and including citation and research) before you can see a classmate's response. You are required to respond to three different classmates. (No fewer than 100 words). Please remember this post and your replies to classmates are due Thursday by 11:59 pm. You are required to cite material from your reading in your post. You may cite material from the lecture or other sources. Please do not include my Discussion in your response.

The organizational chart or the structure of the company and the relationships among its jobs and responsibilities is set up as follows: CEO, Vice President, Director, Manager—each performing separate and critical functions, thereby enabling the organization to function, meet its obligations, and to turn a profit (Reh, 2018).

You will read the Eastman Kodak Company case study later in this course. You are not required to read it for this Discussion. In 1974, Eastman Kodak controlled 90 percent of the film market. By the late 1970s, Eastman Kodak controlled 85 percent of the camera market, and it employed over 60,000 people. Its dominance in the paper film industry led to government action. What many people do not know is that one of Eastman Kodak's engineers invented the first digital camera. Eastman Kodak invested in the development of the camera, but leaders in the company delayed the release of the camera in fear that it would impact the paper film business.

As a manager for Eastman Kodak, how would you have acted in 1974? Would you have delayed the release of the first digital camera? Would you have sided with the leaders and delayed the release? Provide reasons for your decision.

You must first post your answer(s) before you can see the other students’ posts. Submit your initial post(s) early in the module.

See the Discussion Board Guidelines and Rubrics

Download Discussion Board Guidelines and Rubrics.

Reh, F. J. (2018, November 01). Here Is a Look at the Role and Responsibilities of Today's Manager. Retrieved from http://www.thebalancecareers.com/what-is-a-manager-2276096

History discussion on Crisis in Levittown

Overview

The purpose of this discussion is to analyze and evaluate how American race relations shaped the growth of pot war suburbia. 

Instructions:

For this discussion, review your readings and sources for unit 11 and read the following scenario.

Scenario: In the years after World War II, subdivisions like Levittown sprouted up throughout America. Watch the video and review your readings to prepare your response.  Your team will take one of the following roles:

1. African American seeking to move to a segregated suburb like Levittown
2. White American opposed to desegregating the neighborhood.

Answer the following questions.  Be sure to bring in evidence you have found about race relations in America between 1954 and 1957 :

• Why are you interested in living in this neighborhood?
• What are your concerns about desegregation?

Both teams: Write a summary where you answer the following: 

• What does the controversy about Levittown and similar suburbs say about America's rhetoric about being superior to communism during the Cold War?
• What similarities exist between the northern citizens in a suburb like Levittown and their southern neighbors?
• What are the implications of having women voicing their opinions?

Before you complete your discussion, make sure you refer to the course rubric for the expectations for this assignment. 

To form groups, students with last names beginning with A-L will take the role of an African American wishing to move to a segregated suburb. All other students will take the role of a white resident of the suburb. Be sure to put yourself in the shoes of the person you are speaking for -- try to imagine how that person felt, what their ideals were, what they thought was good or right or appropriate at the time, even if you personally do not feel that way.

 Participating in the course discussions is an important part of your final grade. In your discussions, you cannot simply reply to someone's posting with "ditto" or "I agree with you".  You must answer the question(s) asked in a minimum of two paragraphs and a maximum of three paragraphs. Your responses should also quote and cite the material you have read in the class so far; you may also do outside research. Use the Purdue OWL Chicago Style guide for help with the correct citation style for your quotes.

Then, respond to at least TWO classmates’ postings referring to at least one element of critical thinking. Your response to your classmates should be a minimum of two sentences, and a maximum of four sentences (refer to your Introduction to Critical Thinking and to the How to Read History Sources modules for a review of how to read primary sources)

If your need best writing experts, then my course tutor writers are available to help you with any challenges you might be facing.

Discussion 5: American Imperialism

Overview

The purpose of this discussion is to think about the rationale for American imperialism in the late nineteenth century and how it affected people.

Instructions

For this discussion,  review your readings for Unit 5 and study the cartoon carefully. Feel free to do research outside the course if you'd like other points of view.

Prepare a discussion where you explain, based on your readings, what this cartoon is about and what values it expresses.  To do this, adopt the role of ONE of the following individuals and explain who that person was and how that person viewed the events behind this cartoon.

Choose ONE:

• Albert Beveridge (Historian and Republican Senator from Indiana)
• Carl Schurz (Former German revolutionary and Republican Senator from Missouri)
• A resident of one of America's new Caribbean or Pacific colonies

As with the previous assignments, try to put yourself in the shoes of someone in the past -- think about what their life was like, what their behavior and outlook might be. Try to justify your response by describing that life and outlook.

Please make sure you refer to the course rubric for the expectations for this assignment, found in the course resources module.  Participating in the course discussions is an important part of your final grade. In your discussions, you cannot simply reply to someone's posting with "ditto" or "I agree with you."   You must answer the question(s) asked in a minimum of two paragraphs and a maximum of three paragraphs. Your responses should also quote and cite the material you have read in the class so far; you may also do outside research.  Use the Purdue OWL Chicago Style guide  for help with the correct citation style for your quotes.

Then, respond to at least TWO classmates’ postings referring to at least one element of critical thinking.  Your response to your classmates should be a minimum of two sentences, to a maximum of four sentences (refer to your Introduction to Critical Thinking and to the How to Read History Sources modules for a review of how to read primary sources).

Module one Discussion 2 on Indian Assimilation

Overview
The purpose of this discussion is to help you imagine how it felt to be an Indian forced to undergo assimilation at a boarding school far from home and try to understand also the point of view of other people at the time.

Instructions
For this discussion, review your readings for Unit 2. Afterwards, you will analyze the photo of Tom Torlino embedded here. You might also look at Tom Torlino's school record at the Carlisle Indian School site. Feel free to do research outside the course if you'd like other points of view.

Then form groups that represent: a Navajo student, a white male Christian missionary, or an African American who has his or her own issues with assimilation. Each group will answer the following question: How would your character describe the impact of the transformation on Tom Torlino and others like him who attended the Carlisle Boarding School? How did this experience echo the expectations of other Americans for this type of school?

To form groups, students with last names beginning with A-H will take the role of a Navajo child sent to a boarding school. Students with names beginning with I-P will take the role of a white male Christian missionary. Everyone else will take the role of an African American. Be sure to put yourself in the shoes of the person you are speaking for -- try to imagine how that person felt, what their ideals were, what they thought was good or right or appropriate at the time, even if you personally do not feel that way. Remember, history is not about you; it is about what people knew and felt and believed in the past, based on different knowledge than you and other modern people have about what happened later.

Tom Torlino, a member of the Navajo Nation, entered the Carlisle Indian School, a Native American boarding school founded by the United States government in 1879, on October 21, 1882 and just before he departed on August 28, 1886. Torlino’s student file contained photographs from 1882 and 1885. Carlisle Indian School Digital Resource Center.

Before you complete your discussion, make sure you refer to the course rubric for the expectations for this assignment. Participating in the course discussions is an important part of your final grade. In your discussions, you cannot simply reply to someone's posting with "ditto" or "I agree with you". You must answer the question(s) asked in a minimum of two paragraphs and maximum of three paragraphs. Your responses should also quote and cite the material you have read in the class so far; you may also do outside research. Use the Purdue OWL Chicago Style guide for help with the correct citation style for your quotes.

Then, respond to at least TWO classmates’ postings referring to at least one element of critical thinking. Your response to your classmates should be a minimum of two sentences, and a maximum of four sentences (refer to your Introduction to Critical Thinking and to the How to Read History Sources modules for a review of how to read primary sources).
We help students write discussion questions. In case you need help with the whole course, or in writing part of your discussion assignments, then my course tutor experts are best at addressing your assignment writing needs. We provide Timely online writing services to students around the world.

Module one Discussion 2 on Indian Assimilation.docx

Overview

My course tutor writing experts Wish you the best as you reflect on your history course progress

The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on and share the things you have learned in this class.
Instructions

Think about your learning experiences over the entire class. Identify something that made you go "wow" in this class- what surprised or impressed or shocked you? Try not to repeat a "wow" you wrote about earlier.
Describe why this thing stood out to you.  Use quotes from your readings and research to support your observations. Make sure to use your primary sources!
Include an illustration from the period and make sure you caption the illustration.
Share two or three new words you've learned from this module 5, and the definitions.
Your Wow statement should be at least 100-150 words, not including the citations.
By Sunday, respond to the Wows of at least two other students with at least a couple of sentences.

In case you subscribed for our services, we hope My Course tutor writing experts have provided with invaluable tutoring services. We may help you write your final reflection about the history course, before we can wish you the best in your future endeavors.